What did the USDA-APHIS root-cause investigation identify as the most likely entry route for PED into the United States?

Prepare for the TEDA Emerging and Exotic Diseases of Animals Exam with our interactive quizzes. Challenge yourself with multiple choice questions and detailed explanations to enhance your learning and boost your confidence for the exam!

Multiple Choice

What did the USDA-APHIS root-cause investigation identify as the most likely entry route for PED into the United States?

Explanation:
The main idea this question targets is how PED entered the United States in the observed outbreak pattern. The root-cause investigation concluded that contaminated pig feed delivered in bulk was the most likely entry route, specifically pig feed transported in flexible intermediate bulk containers. This makes sense because feed supply chains connect farms across wide areas, and FIBCs are widely used to move large quantities of dry feed, which can become contaminated and then disseminate the virus if not properly cleaned or segregated. PEDV can survive in dry feed ingredients for periods long enough to infect herds that later consume the product, so a single contaminated container or batch can affect multiple farms along the distribution network. The other options don’t fit the evidence as well. A cross-species jump from prairie dogs isn’t supported by outbreak timing and patterns. Feral swine movements from Mexico would require strong, consistent wild-swine involvement that wasn’t demonstrated. Pig swill feeding from cruise ships to backyard pigs was possible in theory, but regulatory controls and patterns of spread pointed to feed ingredients and bulk packaging as the more plausible route in this investigation.

The main idea this question targets is how PED entered the United States in the observed outbreak pattern. The root-cause investigation concluded that contaminated pig feed delivered in bulk was the most likely entry route, specifically pig feed transported in flexible intermediate bulk containers. This makes sense because feed supply chains connect farms across wide areas, and FIBCs are widely used to move large quantities of dry feed, which can become contaminated and then disseminate the virus if not properly cleaned or segregated. PEDV can survive in dry feed ingredients for periods long enough to infect herds that later consume the product, so a single contaminated container or batch can affect multiple farms along the distribution network.

The other options don’t fit the evidence as well. A cross-species jump from prairie dogs isn’t supported by outbreak timing and patterns. Feral swine movements from Mexico would require strong, consistent wild-swine involvement that wasn’t demonstrated. Pig swill feeding from cruise ships to backyard pigs was possible in theory, but regulatory controls and patterns of spread pointed to feed ingredients and bulk packaging as the more plausible route in this investigation.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Passetra

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy