Subclinical foot and mouth infections in horses contributed to disease control problems in Uruguay. Which statement is correct?

Prepare for the TEDA Emerging and Exotic Diseases of Animals Exam with our interactive quizzes. Challenge yourself with multiple choice questions and detailed explanations to enhance your learning and boost your confidence for the exam!

Multiple Choice

Subclinical foot and mouth infections in horses contributed to disease control problems in Uruguay. Which statement is correct?

Explanation:
Subclinical infections in horses are not a major driver of foot-and-mouth disease control problems. Horses are less susceptible and typically show mild or no signs, so they do not sustain or spread the virus as efficiently as cattle or pigs do. In Uruguay, the big challenges in controlling FMD would come from species that amplify and transmit the virus more effectively, along with factors like animal movements and surveillance practices. Therefore, the idea that horse subclinical infections significantly hindered disease control isn’t supported by how FMD spreads, making this statement not correct.

Subclinical infections in horses are not a major driver of foot-and-mouth disease control problems. Horses are less susceptible and typically show mild or no signs, so they do not sustain or spread the virus as efficiently as cattle or pigs do. In Uruguay, the big challenges in controlling FMD would come from species that amplify and transmit the virus more effectively, along with factors like animal movements and surveillance practices. Therefore, the idea that horse subclinical infections significantly hindered disease control isn’t supported by how FMD spreads, making this statement not correct.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Passetra

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy